Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education

• Adesoji, F. A., & Babatunde, A. G. (2008). Investigating gender difficulties and misconceptions in inorganic chemistry at the senior secondary level. International Journal of African and African American Studies, 7(1), 1-7.
• Ahmad, S., & Jamil, S. (2020). Development and application of structural communication grid tests for diagnosing students’ misconceptions in the subject of biology at secondary level. Journal of Contemporary Teacher Education, 4, 73-96.
• Ainiyah, M., Ibrahim, M., & Hidayat, M. T. (2018). The profile of student misconceptions on the human and plant transport systems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1), 012064. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012064
• Akinbadewa, B. O., & Sofowora, O. A. (2020). The effectiveness of multimedia instructional learning packages in enhancing secondary school students’ attitudes toward biology. International Journal on Studies in Education, 2(2), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.19
• Awan, A., Khan, T., & Aslam, T. (2012). Gender disparity in misconceptions about the concept of solution at secondary level students in Pakistan. Journal of Elementary Education, 22(1), 65-79.
• Barrass, R. (1984). Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by teachers and textbooks of biology. Journal of Biological Education, 18(3), 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1984.9654636
• Bhattacharjee, J. (2015). Constructivist approach to learning–An effective approach of teaching learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(4), 23-28.
• Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Norby, M. N. (2011). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Pearson Publishing House.
• Cahyanto, M. A. S, Ashadi, A., & Saputro, S. (2019). An analysis of gender difference on students’ misconceptions in learning the material classification and its changes. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA [Journal of Science Education Innovation], 5(2), 157-167. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i2.26613
• Capik, C., & Gozum, S. (2015). Psychometric features of an assessment instrument with likert and dichotomous response formats. Public Health Nursing, 32(1), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12156
• Chattopadhyay, A. (2005). Understanding of genetic information in higher secondary students in northeast India and the implications for genetics education. Cell Biology Education, 4(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.04-06-0042
• Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P.M., Sasselov, D., & Fredericks, C. (2020). The impact of student misconceptions on student persistence in a MOOC. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(6), 879-910. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21616
• Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. (2015). Relations between intuitive biological thinking and biological misconceptions in biology majors and nonmajors. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-06-0094
• Crawley, F. E., & Arditzoglou, S. Y. (1988). Life and physical science misconceptions of preservice elementary teachers. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the School Science and Mathematics Association, Austin, Texas, USA.
• Deshmukh, N. D. (2015). Why do school students have misconceptions about life processes? In E. G. S. Daniel (Ed.), Biology education and research in a changing planet (pp. 31-43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-524-2_4
• El-Uri, F. I., & Malas, N. (2013). Analysis of use of a single best answer format in an undergraduate medical examination. Qatar Medical Journal, 2013(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2013.1
• Etobro, A. B., & Fabinu, O. E. (2017). Students’ perceptions of difficult concepts in biology in senior secondary schools in Lagos State. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 139-147. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.8
• Flores, F., Tovar, M. E., & Gallegos, L. (2003). Representation of the cell and its processes in high school students: An integrated view. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 269-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210126793
• Garvin-Doxas, K., Klymkowsky, M., & Elrod, S. (2007). Building, using, and maximizing the impact of concept inventories in the biological sciences: Report on a National Science Foundation sponsored conference on the construction of concept inventories in the biological sciences. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 277-282. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-05-0031
• Gómez-Rodríguez, R., Díaz-Pulido, B., Gutiérrez-Ortega, C., Sánchez-Sánchez, B., & Torres-Lacomba, M. (2020). Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the standardised Nordic Questionnaire Spanish version in musicians. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 653-663. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020653
• González, G. M. C., Herrara, B. S., & Rosero, E. V. (2016). Development and psychometric tests of the instrument “caring” -short version to measure the competence of care at home. The Revista de la Universidad Industrial de Santander. Salud [The Magazine of the Industrial University of Santander. Health], 48(2), 222-231. https://doi.org/10.18273/revsal.v48n2-2016007
• Green, K., Roller, C., & Cubeta, M. (2019). A plethora of fungi: Teaching a middle school unit on fungi. Science Activities, 56(2), 52-62.
• Green, S., & Thompson, M. (2005). Structural equation modeling in clinical psychology research. In M. Roberts, & S. Ilardi (Eds.), Handbook of research in clinical psychology (pp. 139-189). Wiley-Blackwell Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756980
• Hadjichambis, A. C., Georgiou, Y., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Kyza, E. A., & Mappouras, D. (2016). Investigating the effectiveness of an inquiry-based intervention on human reproduction in relation to students’ gender, prior knowledge and motivation for learning in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 50(3), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2015.1067241
• Halim, A. S., Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S.A., Olsen, L. J., Gere, A. R., & Shultz, G. V. (2018). Identifying and remediating student misconceptions in introductory biology via writing-to-learn assignments and peer review. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-10-0212
• Hasibuan, H., & Djulia, E. (2016). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa pada materi virus di kelas X Aliyah Al-fajri Tanjungbalai tahun pembelajaran 2016/2017 [Analysis of students’ learning difficulties on virus material in class X Aliyah Al-fajri Tanjungbalai for the 2016/2017 academic year]. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan [Journal of Educational Pelita], 4(4), 16-24.
• Hasyim, W., Suwono, H., & Susilo, H. (2018). Three-tier test to identify students’ misconception of human reproduction system. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains [Journal of Science Education], 6(2), 48-54.
• Hershey, D. R. (2004). Avoid misconceptions when teaching about plants. http://www.actionbioscience.org/education/hershey.html
• Hershey, D. R. (2005). More misconceptions to avoid when teaching about plants. American Institute of Biological Sciences. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501356.pdf
• Jia, C., Yang, T., Qian, Y., & Wu, X. (2020). The gender differences in science achievement, interest, habit, and creativity. Science Education International, 31(2), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.9
• Kalas, P., O’Neill, A., Pollock, C., & Birol, G. (2013). Development of a meiosis concept inventory. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 655-664. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-10-0174
• Karakaya, F., Yilmaz, M., Cimen, O., & Adiguzel, M. (2020). Identifying and correcting pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about the alternation of generations. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 9(4), 1047-1063. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.654967
• Kareem, A. A. (2018). The use of multimedia in teaching biology and its impact on students’ learning outcomes. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 9, 157-165.
• Karpudewan, M., Zain, A. N. M., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2017). Introduction: Misconceptions in science education: An overview. In M. Karpudewan, A. N. Zain, & A. L. Chandrasegaran (Eds.), Overcoming students’ misconceptions in science (pp. 1-5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3437-4_1
• Katz, I. (2017). In the eye of the beholder: Motivational effects of gender differences in perceptions of teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1101533
• Kaufman, R., Watkins, R., & Guerra, I. (2002). Getting valid and useful educational results and payoffs: We are what we say, do, and deliver. International Journal of Educational Reform, 11(1), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678790201100105
• Kennedy, G., & Lodge, J. (2016). All roads lead to Rome: Tracking students’ affect as they overcome misconceptions. In Proceedings of the ASCILITE: Shaping the Future of Tertiary Education (pp. 318-329).
• Klymkowsky, M. W., Underwood, S. M., & Garvin-Doxas, K. (2010). The biological concepts instrument (BCI): A diagnostic tool to reveal student thinking. arXiv:1012.4501v1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1012.4501
• Kristyasari, M. L., Yamtinah, S., Utomo, S.B., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Gender differences in students’ science literacy towards learning on integrated science subject. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012002
• Kubiatko, M., Fančovičová, J., & Prokop, P. (2021). Factual knowledge of students about plants is associated with attitudes and interest in botany. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1426-1440. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1917790
• Kumandas, B., Ateskan, A., & Lane, J. (2019). Misconceptions in biology: A meta-synthesis study of research, 2000-2014. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 350-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1490798
• Kwen, B. H. (2005). Teachers’ misconceptions of biological science concepts as revealed in science examination papers. In Proceedings of the AARE 2005 International Education Research Conference, Parramatta, Australia.
• Lamichhane, R., Reck, C., & Maltese, A. V. (2018). Undergraduate chemistry students’ misconceptions about reaction coordinate diagrams. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(3), 834-845. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00045J
• Lampert, P., Scheuch, M., Pany, P., Müllner, B., & Kiehn, M. (2019). Understanding students’ conceptions of plant reproduction to better teach plant biology in schools. Plants, People, Planet, 1(3), 248-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.52
• Libarkin, J. C. (2008). Concept inventories in higher education science. In Proceedings of the National Research Council Promising Practices in Undergraduate STEM Education Workshop 2, Washington, DC.
• Lin, S. W. (2004). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test for high school students’ understanding of flowering plant growth and development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 175-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-6484-y
• Macklem, G. L. (2015). Boredom in the classroom: Addressing student motivation, self-regulation, and engagement in learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13120-7
• Mann, M., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). A pencil and paper instrument to diagnose students’ conceptions of breathing, gas exchange and respiration. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 44(2), 55-60.
• Maskour, L., Alami, A., Agorram, B., & Zaki, M. (2016). Study of some learning difficulties in plant classification among university students. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 5, 294-297.
• Maskour, L., Alami, A., Zaki, M., & Agorram, B. (2019). Plant classification knowledge and misconceptions among university students in Morocco. Education Sciences, 9(1), 48-68. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010048
• Moodley, K., & Gaigher, E. (2019). Teaching electric circuits: Teachers’ perceptions and learners’ misconceptions. Research in Science Education, 49, 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11165-017-9615-5
• Mulungye, M. M., O’Connor, M., & Ndethiu, S. (2016). Sources of student errors and misconceptions in algebra and effectiveness of classroom practice remediation in Machakos County-Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(10), 31-33.
• Murat, M., Kanadli, S., & Unisen, A. (2011). Seventh grade students’ misconceptions about animals’ reproduction, growth and development and their likely resources. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(1), 179-197.
• Nehm, R., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57(3), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570311
• Nilson, L. B. (2010). Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors. Jossey-Bass Publications.
• Novitasari, C., Ramli, M., & Karyanto, P. (2019). Content analysis of misconceptions on bacteria in the biology textbook of high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2), 022076. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022076
• NRC. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school experience. National Academies Press.
• NRC. (2003). BIO 2010: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists. National Academies Press.
• Oberoi, M. (2017). Review of literature on student’s misconceptions in science. International Journal of Scientific Research and Education, 5(3), 6274-6280.
• Osorio, V. M. L., & Jaimes, L. E. (2019). Content and face validity of the Spanish version of the sexual self-concept inventory for early adolescent girls. Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria [Nursing Research and Education], 37(1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v37n1e02
• Perrone, M. K. (2007). Addressing student misconceptions about reproduction and heredity: Classroom based research project. Education Journal, 545-631.
• Potvin, P., & Cyr, G. (2017). Toward a durable prevalence of scientific conceptions: Tracking the effects of two interfering misconceptions about Buoyancy from preschoolers to science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1121-1142. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21396
• Quaigrain, K., & Arhin, A. K. (2017). Using reliability and item analysis to evaluate a teacher-developed test in educational measurement and evaluation. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1301013. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1301013
• Quansah, F. (2017). The use of Cronbach alpha reliability estimate in research among students in public universities in Ghana. African Journal of Teacher Education, 6(1), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v6i1.3970
• Queloz, A. C., Klymkowsky, M. W., Stern, E., Hafen, E., & Köhler, K. (2017). Diagnostic of students’ misconceptions using the biological concepts instrument (BCI): A method for conducting an educational needs assessment. PLoS ONE, 12(5), e0176906. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176906
• Ramadhani, R., Abdullah, A., Hasanuddin, H., & Khairil, K. (2020). The implementation of constructivist modules to correct misconceptions on the human reproductive system concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 012062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012062
• Rillo, A., Martínez, B., Castillo, J., & Rementería, J. (2020). Constructivism: An interpretation from medical education. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 10(3), 1-12.
• Roy, A., & Singh, S. (2021). Investigating the learning gaps of senior-secondary children through original (real-life) biological Images: What really lacks? Voices of Teachers and Teacher Educators, 10(1), 177-190.
• Rubio, D. M. (2005). Alpha reliability. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement (pp. 59-63). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00395-9
• Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smit, N., & Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020-1049. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213477680
• Schussler, E. (2008). From flowers to fruits: How children’s books represent plant reproduction. International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1677-1696. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701570248
• Selcuk, A., & Mehmet, Y. (2020). The effect of constructivist learning approach and active learning on environmental education: A meta-analysis study. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 10(1), 44-84.
• Sewell, A. (2002). Constructivism and student misconceptions: Why every teacher needs to know about them. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 48(4), 24-28.
• Stein, M., Larrabee, T. G., & Barman, C. R. (2008). A study of common beliefs and misconceptions in physical science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(2), 1- 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173666
• Stern, F., Kampourakis, K., Huneault, C., Silveira, P., & Müller, A. (2018). Undergraduate biology students’ teleological and essentialist misconceptions. Education Sciences, 8(3), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030135
• Susanti, R., Rustaman, Y. N., & Sri, R. (2010). Profile material difficulty level of plant physiology according to prospective biology teachers. In Proceedings of the 4^th International Seminar on Science Education, Science Education Program School of Postgraduate Studies, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung, West Java.
• Taber, K. S. (2011). Models, molecules and misconceptions: A commentary on secondary school students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(1), 3-18.
• Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
• Taiwo, S. K., & Emeke, E. A. (2014). Relationship among learning style preferences, gender, age, and students’ achievement in senior secondary school biology. West African Journal of Education, XXXIV, 273-283.
• Tristán-López, A. (2008). Modificación al modelo de Lawshe para el dictamen cuantitativo de la validez de contenido de un instrumento objetivo [Modification to the Lawshe model for the quantitative opinion of the content validity of an objective instrument]. Avances en Medición [Advances in Measurement], 6(1), 37-48.
• Trochim, W. M. (2005). The research methods knowledge base. http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/kb/index.htm
• Unal, S., Costu, B., & Ayas, A. (2010). Secondary school students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2), 3-29.
• Vaishali, & Misra, P. K. (2020). Implications of constructivist approaches in the classrooms: The role of the teachers. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 17-25. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v7i430205
• Wartono, Batlolona, J. R., & Putirulan, A. (2018). Cognitive conflict strategy and simulation practicum to overcome student misconception on light topics. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(4), 747-757. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i4.10433
• Wong, K. C., Lam, Y. R., & Ho, L. M. (2002). The effects of schooling on gender differences. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 827-843. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000019080
• Wynn, A. N., Pan, I. L., Rueschhoff, E.E., Herman, M. A., & Archer, E. K. (2017). Student misconceptions about plants–A first step in building a teaching resource. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 18(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v18i1.1253
• Yalim, E. (2021). High school students’ level of knowledge and attitudes towards the use of technology in biology classrooms [Master’s thesis, Bilkent University].
• Yamtinah, S., Masykuri, M., Ashadi, & Shidiq, A. S. (2017). Gender differences in students’ attitudes toward science: An analysis of students’ science process skill using testlet instrument. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868(1), 030003. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995102
• Yip, D. Y. (1998). Children’s misconceptions on reproduction and implications for teaching. Journal of Biological Education, 33(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1998.9655632
• Yucel, E. O, & Ozkan, M. (2015). Determination of secondary school students’ cognitive structure, and misconception in ecological concepts through word association test. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 660-674. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.2022
• Zeilik, M., & Morris-Dueer, V. J. (2005). What are essential concepts in ‘Astronomy 101’? A new approach to find consensus from two different samples of instructors. Astronomy Education Review, 2(3), 61-108. https://doi.org/10.3847/AER2004017

APA

Roy, A., & Mohapatra, A. K. (2022). A Gender-based Investigation of Indian Senior Secondary Students’ Misconceptions about Plant Reproduction through Concept Inventory. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2287. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12089

Vancouver

Roy A, Mohapatra AK. A Gender-based Investigation of Indian Senior Secondary Students’ Misconceptions about Plant Reproduction through Concept Inventory. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4):e2287. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12089

AMA

Roy A, Mohapatra AK. A Gender-based Investigation of Indian Senior Secondary Students’ Misconceptions about Plant Reproduction through Concept Inventory. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4), e2287. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12089

Chicago

Roy, Anirban, and Animesh Kumar Mohapatra. "A Gender-based Investigation of Indian Senior Secondary Students’ Misconceptions about Plant Reproduction through Concept Inventory". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2022 18 no. 4 (2022): e2287. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12089

Harvard

Roy, A., and Mohapatra, A. K. (2022). A Gender-based Investigation of Indian Senior Secondary Students’ Misconceptions about Plant Reproduction through Concept Inventory. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2287. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12089

MLA

Roy, Anirban et al. "A Gender-based Investigation of Indian Senior Secondary Students’ Misconceptions about Plant Reproduction through Concept Inventory". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 18, no. 4, 2022, e2287. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12089