Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education

• Albert, R., & Koster, C. J. (2002). Empirie in Linguistik und Sprachlehrforschung. Ein methodologisches Arbeitsbuch [Empirical research in linguistics and language teaching. A methodological workbook]. Tübingen, Germany: Narr.
• Appleton, K. (2007). Elementary Science Teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 493–535). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Arens, A. K., & Jansen, M. (2016). Self-concepts in reading, writing, listening, and speaking: A multidimensional and hierarchical structure and its generalizability across native and foreign languages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 646–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000081
• Atzert, R., John, R., Preisfeld, A., & Damerau, K. (2020). Der Einfluss kriterialer, sozialer und individueller Bezugsnormen auf das experimentbezogene Fähigkeitsselbstkonzept [The influence of the criterial, social, and temporal reference norm on students’ experiment-related self-concept]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 26, 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-020-00114-x
• Atzert, R., Tilli, J., Preisfeld, A., & Damerau, K. (under review). Experimentation-related self-concept of German upper secondary school students. RISTAL.
• Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Wulff, P., & Weiber, R. (2018). Multivariate Analysemethoden [Multivariate methods of analysis] (15th ed.). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56655-8
• Bartlett, M. S. (1951). The effect of standardization on a chi square approximation in factor analysis. Biometrika, 38(3/4), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.337
• Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers' professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers. Mathematics teacher education, vol. 8 (pp. 25–48). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_2
• Beudels, M., Schilling, Y., & Preisfeld, A. (under review). Mit Experimenten zu Wasserläufer & Co Kohärenz erleben - Potenziale eines interdisziplinären, experimentellen Kurses zur Professionalisierung angehender Sachunterrichtslehrkräfte [Experience coherence with experiments on water striders & Co - Potentials of an interdisciplinary, experimental course for professionalizing pre-service General Studies teachers]. DiMawe - Zeitschrift für Konzepte und Arbeitsmaterialien für Lehrer*innenbildung und Unterricht.
• Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382
• Bosch, K. (2006). Planning classroom management. A five-step process to creating a positive learning environment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329451
• Bühl, A. (2019). Einführung in die moderne Datenanalyse ab SPSS 25 [Introduction to modern data analysis from SPSS 25] (16th ed.). Hallbergmoos, Germany: Pearson.
• Bühner, M. (2021). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion [Introduction to test and questionnaire construction] (4th ed.). München, Germany: Pearson.
• Burton, S., & Nesbit, P. L. (2008). Block or traditional? An analysis of student choice of teaching format. Journal of Management & Organization, 14(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200003448
• Buse, M. (2017). Bilinguale englische experimentelle Lehr-Lernarrangements im Fach Biologie. Konzeption, Durchführung und Evaluation der kognitiven und affektiven Wirksamkeit [Bilingual teaching in biology. Its cognitive and affective-motivational impact]. Dissertation, University of Wuppertal, Germany. Retrieved from: http://elpub.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/edocs/dokumente/fbc/biologie/diss2017/buse/dc1722.pdf.
• Buse, M., Damerau, K., & Preisfeld, A. (2018). A scientific out-of-school programme on neurobiology employing CLIL. Its impact on the cognitive acquisition and experimentation-related ability self-concepts. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 13(8), 647-660.
• Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
• Damerau, K. (2012). Molekulare und Zell-Biologie im Schülerlabor [Molecular and cell biology in an out-of-school laboratory]. Dissertation, University of Wuppertal, Germany. Retrieved from: http://elpub.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/edocs/dokumente/fbc/biologie/diss2012/damerau/dc1231.pdf.
• Daniel, E. L. (2000). A review of time-shortened courses across disciplines. College Student Journal, 34, 298–308.
• Dickhäuser, O. (2006). Fähigkeitsselbstkonzepte – Entstehung, Auswirkung, Förderung [Academic self-concepts – Formation, effect, enhancement]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20(1/2), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.20.12.5
• Dixon, L. & O’Gorman, V. (2019). ‘Block teaching’ – exploring lecturers' perceptions of intensive modes of delivery in the context of undergraduate education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(5). 583-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1564024
• Döring, N., & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften [Research methods and evaluation in social sciences and humanities] (5th ed.). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5
• Emereole, H. U. (2009). Learners‘ and teachers‘ conceptual knowledge of science processes: The case of Botswana. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 1033–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9137-8
• Federal Statistical Office (2020). Lehrkräfte nach Schularten und Beschäftigung. Schuljahr 2019/20. Stand: 20. Oktober 2020 [Teachers by type of school and employment. The academic year 2019/20. Status as of 20. October 2020]. Retrieved from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Schulen/Tabellen/allgemeinbildende-beruflicheschulen-lehrkraefte.html.
• Festner, D., Schaper, N., & Gröschner, A. (2018) Einschätzung der Unterrichtskompetenz und -qualität im Praxissemester [Assessment of teaching skills and quality in the practical semester]. In J. König, M. Rothland, N. Schaper N. (Eds.), Learning to Practice, Learning to Reflect? (pp. 163–194). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19536-6_6
• Fleischer, T., Virtbauer, L., & Strahl., A. (2020). Experimente im NAWI-Unterricht. Kompetenzen angehender Lehrkräfte [Experiments in science lessons. Pre-service teachers‘ competencies]. In S. Habig (Ed.), Naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen in der Gesellschaft von morgen (pp. 848–851). Duisburg/Essen, Germany: University of Duisburg-Essen.
• Franken, N. (2020). Kognitive und affektiv-motivationale Kompetenzen von Lehramtsstudierenden der Fächer Biologie, Chemie und Sachunterricht im Kontext des Praxissemesters [Cognitive and affective-motivational competencies of pre-sevice biology, chemistry and science and social studies teachers in the context of the practical semester]. Dissertation, University of Wuppertal, Germany. Retrieved from: http://elpub.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-10821/dc2024.pdf.
• Franken, N., Damerau, K., & Preisfeld, A. (2020). „Experimentieren kann ich gut!“ – Experimentbezogene Fähigkeitsselbstkonzepte von Lehramtsstudierenden der Fächer Biologie, Chemie und Sachunterricht ["My experimental skills are excellent!" – Academic self-concepts of experimental skills of pre-service teachers with the school subjects biology, chemistry and elementary science]. Zeitschrift für die Didaktik der Biologie (ZDB) – Biologie Lehren und Lernen, 24, 48–66. https://doi.org/10.4119/zdb-1733
• Fromm, S. (2012). Faktoren- und Reliabilitätsanalyse [Factor and reliability analysis]. In S. Fromm (Ed.), Datenanalyse mit SPSS für Fortgeschrittene 2: Multivariate Verfahren für Querschnittsdaten (pp. 53–82). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18794-5_3
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Germann, P. J., & Aram, R. J. (1996). Student performances on the science processes of recording data, analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and providing evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 773–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<773::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-K
• Girwidz, R. (2020). Experimentieren im Physikunterricht [Experimentation in physics lessons]. In E. Kircher, R. Girdwidz & H.E. Fischer (Eds.), Physikdidaktik Grundlagen (4th ed.) (pp. 263–291). Berlin, Germany: Springer Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59490-2_7
• Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90025-X
• Gyllenpalm, J., & Wickman, P.-O. (2011). “Experiments” and the inquiry emphasis conflation in science teacher education. Science Teacher Education, 95(5), 908–926. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20446
• Haslbeck, H. (2019). Die Variablenkontrollstrategie in der Grundschule [The control-of-variables strategy in primary school]. Dissertation, Technical University of Munich, Germany. Retrieved from: https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1487608/1487608.pdf.
• Hilfert-Rüppell, D., Looß, M., Klingenberg, K., Eghtessad, A., Höner, K., Müller, R., Strahl, A., & Pietzner, V. (2013). Scientific reasoning of prospective science teachers in designing a biological experiment. Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand, 6(2), 135–154.
• Hilkenmeier, J., & Sommer, S. (2014). Praxisnahe Fallarbeit – Block versus wöchentliches Seminar. Ein Vergleich zweier Veranstaltungsformate in der Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung [Case-based learning – Block scheduling versus traditional scheduling. A comparison of two course concepts in teacher education]. Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung, 32(1), 88–100.
• Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students' ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20072
• Janssen, J., & Laatz, W. (2017). Statistische Datenanalyse mit SPSS [Statistical data analysis with SPSS] (9th ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53477-9
• Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy – Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400115
• Kirsch, A. (2020). Qualitätsstandards für die Unterrichtsplanung im Fach Sachunterricht [Quality standards for planning in the subject of General Studies]. HLZ – Herausforderung Lehrer*innenbildung, 3(1), 406–422. https://doi.org/10.4119/hlz-2557
• Kleickmann, T., Möller, K., & Jonen, A. (2006). Die Wirksamkeit von Fortbildungen und die Bedeutung tutorieller Unterstützung [Effectiveness of trainings and importance of tutorial support]. In R. Hinz & T. Pütz (Eds.), Professionelles Handeln in der Grundschule. Entwicklungslinien und Forschungsbefunde (pp. 121–128). Hohengehren, Germany: Schneider.
• Kuckartz, U., Rädiker, S., Ebert, T., & Schehl, J. (2013). Statistik. Eine verständliche Einführung [Statistics. An understandable introduction] (2nd ed.). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19890-3
• Kurth, C., & Wodzinski, R. (2020). Schwierigkeiten beim eigenständigen Experimentieren am Beispiel Hebel [Difficulties in autonomous experimentation using the example of levers]. In S. Habig (Ed.), Naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen in der Gesellschaft von morgen (pp. 262–265). Duisburg/Essen, Germany: University of Duisburg-Essen.
• Leiner, D. (2006). SoSci Survey (Computer Software). Retrieved from: https://www.soscisurvey.de/.
• Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., Marsh, H. W., & Trautwein, U. (2005). Teacher frame of reference and the big-fish-little-pond effect. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.10.002
• Marsh, H. W. (1992). Content specificity of relations between academic achievement and academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.35
• Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1988). A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.366
• Marsh, H. W., Salah Abduljabbar, A., Parker, P. D., Abdelfattah, F., Nagengast, B., Möller, J., & Abu-Hilal, M. M. (2015). The internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept and achievement relations: Age-cohort and cross-cultural differences. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 168–202. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214549453
• Merkens, H. (2010). Unterricht: Eine Einführung [Teaching: An introduction]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
• Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction – what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
• Möller, J., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Selbstkonzept [Self-concept]. In E. Wild & J. Möller (Eds.), Pädagogische Psychologie (2nd ed.) (pp. 177–199). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41291-2_8
• Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.667014
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2015). Science teachers’ learning. Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21836
• Nerdel, C. (2017). Grundlagen der Naturwissenschaftsdidaktik [Basics of (natural) sciences didactics]. Berlin, Germany: Springer Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53158-7
• Noormann, P. (2017). Mehrstufige Eigenmarken – Eine empirische Analyse von Zielen, Erfolgsdeterminanten und Grenzen [Multilevel own brands – An empirical analysis of goals, success factors and limits]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16005-0
• Paulick, I., Großschedl, J., Harms, U., & Möller, J. (2016). Preservice teachers’ professional knowledge and its relation to academic self-concept. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(3), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116639263
• Paulick, I., Großschedl, J., Harms, U., & Möller, J. (2017). How teachers perceive their expertise: The role of dimensional and social comparisons. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.06.007
• Peschel, M. (2018). SelfPro: Entwicklung von Professionsverständnissen und Selbstkonzepten angehender Lehrkräfte beim Offenen Experimentieren [SelfPro: Development of pre-service teachers‘ professional understanding and self-concepts in open experimentation]. In S. Miller et al. (Eds.), Profession und Disziplin. Jahrbuch Grundschulforschung vol. 22 (pp. 191–196). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13502-7_21
• Porsch, R., & Wendt, H. (2016). Aus- und Fortbildung von Mathematik- und Sachunterrichtslehrkräften [Education and training of maths and science and social studies teachers]. In H. Wendt et al. (Eds.), TIMSS 2015. Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen von Grundschulkindern in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 189–204). Münster, Germany/New York, NY: Waxmann.
• Rasch, B., Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Naumann, E. (2014a). Quantitative Methoden 1 [Quantitative methods 1] (4th ed.). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43524-3
• Rasch, B., Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Naumann, E. (2014b). Quantitative Methoden 2 [Quantitative methods 2] (4th ed.). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43548-9
• Rautenstrauch, H., & Busker, M. (2020). Experimentieren im Naturwissenschafts- und Chemieunterricht [Experimentation in science and chemistry lessons]. In S. Habig (Ed.), Naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen in der Gesellschaft von morgen (pp. 345–348). Duisburg/Essen, Germany: University of Duisburg-Essen.
• Samarawickrema, G., & Cleary, K. (2021). Block mode study: Opportunities and challenges for a new generation of learners in an Australian university. Student Success, 12(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.1579
• Schaal, S., & Randler, S. (2004). Konzeption und Evaluation eines computergestützten kooperativen Blockseminars zur Systematik der Blütenpflanzen [Development and evaluation of a computer-supported cooperative compact course in botanical systematics]. Zeitschrift für Hochschuldidaktik, 2(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3217/zfhd02/03
• Schreiber, N., Theyßen, H., & Schecker, H. (2009). Experimentelle Kompetenz messen?! [Evaluating experimental competencies]. Physik und Didaktik in Schule und Hochschule, 3(8), 92-101.
• Schreiber, N., Theyßen, H., & Dickmann, M. (2016). Wie genau beurteilen Schülerinnen und Schüler ihre eigenen experimentellen Fähigkeiten? Ein Ansatz zur praktikablen Diagnostik experimenteller Fähigkeiten im Unterrichtsalltag. [How accurate can students assess their own experimental skills? An approach to feasibly assess experimental skills in the classroom]. Physik und Didaktik in Schule und Hochschule, 1(15), 49–63.
• Schulz, A., Wirtz, M., & Starauschek, E. (2012). Das Experiment in den Naturwissenschaften [The experiment in (natural) sciences]. In W. Rieß, M. Wirtz, B. Barzel & A. Schulz (Eds.), Experimentieren im mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht. Schüler lernen wissenschaftlich denken und arbeiten (pp. 15–38). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
• Schwichow, M. G., Croker, S., Zimmerman, C., Höffler, T. N., & Härtig, H. (2016). Teaching the control-of-variables strategy: A meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 39(1), 37–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.12.001
• Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., Wittwer, J., & Schwindt, K. (2007). Unterricht in den Naturwissenschaften [Science classes]. In M. Prenzel et al. (Eds.), PISA 2006. Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie (pp. 147–180). Münster: Waxmann.
• Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046003407
• Sorge, S., Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Möller, J. (2019). Investigating the relationship between pre-service physics teachers' professional knowledge, self-concept, and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(7), 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21534
• Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs (KMK) (2004). Standards für die Lehrerbildung: Bildungswissenschaften [Teacher education standards: Educational sciences]. Retrieved from: http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2004/2004_12_16-Standards-Lehrerbildung.pdf.
• Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs (KMK) (2008/2019). Ländergemeinsame inhaltliche Anforderungen für die Fachwissenschaften und Fachdidaktiken in der Lehrerbildung [Common standards for specialist science and subject didactics in teacher education]. Retrieved from: http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2008/2008_10_16-Fachprofile-Lehrerbildung.pdf.
• Tänzer, S. (2010). Bedingungen und Voraussetzungen in der Lehrperson [Conditions and requirements in a teacher]. In S. Tänzer & R. Lauterbach (Eds.), Sachunterricht begründet planen (pp. 64–76). Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt.
• Tesch, M., & Duit, R. (2004). Experimentieren im Physikunterricht – Ergebnisse einer Videostudie [Experimentation in physics lessons – Results of a video study]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 10, 51–69.
• Tolsdorf, Y., & Markic, S. (2018). Development and changes in student teachers’ knowledge concerning diagnostic in chemistry teaching – A longitudinal case study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1613. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/94232
• Wahl, D. (2013). Lernumgebungen erfolgreich gestalten. Vom trägen Wissen zum kompetenten Handeln [Successfully designing learning environments. From dull knowledge to competent action] (3rd ed.). Bad Heilbrunn, Germany: Klinkhardt.
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12(3), 265–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P
• Wolff, F., Helm, F., Zimmermann, F., Nagy, G., & Möller, J. (2018). On the effects of social, temporal, and dimensional comparisons on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(7), 1005–1025. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000248
• Yeung, A. S., Craven, R. G., & Kaur, G. (2014). Teachers’ self-concept and valuing of learning: Relations with teaching approaches and beliefs about students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2014.905670
• Yip, D. Y. (2001). Assessing and developing the concept of assumptions in science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009473215126

APA

Beudels, M. M., Preisfeld, A., & Damerau, K. (2022). Impact of an Experiment-Based Intervention on Pre-Service Primary School Teachers’ Experiment-Related and Science Teaching-Related Self-Concepts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(1), e2258. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11323

Vancouver

Beudels MM, Preisfeld A, Damerau K. Impact of an Experiment-Based Intervention on Pre-Service Primary School Teachers’ Experiment-Related and Science Teaching-Related Self-Concepts. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(1):e2258. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11323

AMA

Beudels MM, Preisfeld A, Damerau K. Impact of an Experiment-Based Intervention on Pre-Service Primary School Teachers’ Experiment-Related and Science Teaching-Related Self-Concepts. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(1), e2258. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11323

Chicago

Beudels, Melanie Marita, Angelika Preisfeld, and Karsten Damerau. "Impact of an Experiment-Based Intervention on Pre-Service Primary School Teachers’ Experiment-Related and Science Teaching-Related Self-Concepts". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2022 18 no. 1 (2022): e2258. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11323

Harvard

Beudels, M. M., Preisfeld, A., and Damerau, K. (2022). Impact of an Experiment-Based Intervention on Pre-Service Primary School Teachers’ Experiment-Related and Science Teaching-Related Self-Concepts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(1), e2258. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11323

MLA

Beudels, Melanie Marita et al. "Impact of an Experiment-Based Intervention on Pre-Service Primary School Teachers’ Experiment-Related and Science Teaching-Related Self-Concepts". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 18, no. 1, 2022, e2258. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11323