Interpretation of Reality in Sustainability Processes: Dialogues in the Framework of Global Warming

Wesles Sedano Aguilar

doi:10.21601/ijese/12184

Full Text (PDF)

Wesles Sedano Aguilar ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Department of Biology, Martin-Luther-Universität-Halle-Wittenberg, GERMANY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The environment as a human construction brings us closer to the dialogues between ontologies and epistemologies with which the human being relates and builds a possible interpretation of reality. This document addresses the interpretation of the reality of three people (7, 30, and 75 years old) who live with the consequences of climate change generated by the actions of human beings on planet earth. Each person participated in an interview to analyze their contextualization and interpretation of reality regarding an environmental problem. The results describe ontological, epistemological and the complexity elements in the language of the interviewees. Those elements would come from the mental intentions that configure interpretations of reality (IR) that the participants communicated through language.

Keywords

interpretation of reality
ontology
epistemology
complexity

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED, Volume 18, Issue 3, 2022, Article No: e2293

https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12184

Publication date: 29 Jun 2022

Article Views: 1178

Article Downloads: 623

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Astudillo-Banegas, J. (2014). La participación social va más con el buen vivir que con el desarrollo [Social participation goes more with good living than with development]. Economics and Politics Magazine, 19, 120-135. https://doi.org/10.25097/rep.n19.2014.06
Banegas, J. E. A., & Cordero, M. A. G. (2018). El trabajo comunitario en la práctica del buen vivir: Comuna Manteña De Agua Blanca [Community work in the practice of good living: Manteña Commune of Agua Blanca–Ecuador]. Necessary Work Magazine, 16(31), 12-35. https://doi.org/10.22409/tn.16i31.p27370
Caudillo Félix, G. A. (2012). El buen vivir: Un diálogo intercultural [Good living: An intercultural dialogue]. Ra Ximhai, 8(2), 345-364. https://doi.org/10.35197/rx.08.01.e.2012.14.gc
Larreal Maldonado, A. M. (2011). El buen vivir como contrahegemonía en la Constitución Ecuatoriana [Good living as counter-hegemony in the Ecuadorian Constitution]. Utopía Y Praxis Latinoamericana [Utopia and Latin American Praxis], 16(53), 59-70.
Morin, E. (1996). Green thinking. Gazette of Anthropology, 12, 1-7.
Posada, J. 2014. Ontología y lenguaje de la realidad social [Ontology and language of social reality]. Moebius Tape, 50, 70-79. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2014000200003
Puerto Layton, C. M., & Tovar-Gálvez, J. C. (2020). Proposal for an assessment system of environmental education processes based on complexity expressions scenarios. https://periodicoscientificos.itp.ifsp.edu.br/index.php/rifp/article/view/236
Searle, J. (1997). The construction of social reality. Paidós. https://doi.org/10.2307/2953731
Sedano Aguilar, W., Puerto, M., & Tovar-Gálvez, J. C. (2021). Evaluando la interpretación de la realidad lograda en un proyecto ambiental [Evaluating the interpretation of reality achieved in an environmental project]. Actas XI Congreso Internacional sobre Investigación en la Didáctica de las Ciencias, Universidad de Lisboa. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354387248_Evaluando_la_interpretacion_de_la_realidad_lograda_en_un_proyecto_ambiental
Soto Kiewit, L. D. (2020). Ontological conceptions as a point of access to the social sciences and their various methodological perspectives. ABRA Magazine, 40(61), 33-61. https://doi.org/10.15359/abra.40-61.2
Terrón Amigo, E. (2004). La educación ambiental en la educación básica, un proyecto inconcluso [Environmental education in basic education, an unfinished project]. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos [Latin American Journal of Educational Studies], XXXIV(4),107-164.
Tirzo, J. G., & Hernández, J. G. (2010). Relaciones interculturales, interculturalidad y multiculturalismo; teorías, conceptos, actores y referencias [Intercultural relations, interculturality and multiculturalism; theories, concepts, actors and references]. Cuicuilco, 17(48), 11-34.
Tovar-Gálvez, J. C. (2020). Reducing the gap between theory and practice during the pandemic: Planning a complex virtual environmental project. Revista Internacional De Pesquisa Em Didática das Ciências E Matemática [International Journal of Research in Didactics of Science and Mathematics], 1, e020017.
Tovar-Gálvez, J. C. (2022). Interpretation of the reality in environmental education: Identification of mono-, multi-, inter-, trans-disciplinary and inter-epistemic experiences. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(3), e2274. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11879
Tovar-Gálvez, J. C., & Acher, A. (2021). Design of evidence-based intercultural science teaching practices. Science Education, 39(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2891
Tovar-Gálvez, J. C., & Sedano Aguilar, W. (2014). Taller: Niveles de reflexión epistémica en didáctica de las ciencias [Workshop: Levels of epistemic reflection in science education]. III Congreso Internacional y V Nacional de Educación Pedagogía y Cultura Ambiental, (499-504). Florencia: Universidad de la Amazonía. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269279108_Taller_niveles_de_reflexion_epistemica_en_didactica_de_las_ciencias
Tubino, F. (2005). La praxis de la interculturalidad en los Estados Nacionales Latinoamericanos [The praxis of interculturality in the Latin American National States]. Intercultural Notebooks, 3(5), 83-96.
Walsh, C. (2010). Critical interculturality and intercultural education. In V. Jorge (Eds.), Building critical interculturality (pp. 75-96). Andres Bello Agreement.
Zachariou, F., Voulgari, I., Tsami, E., & Bersimis, S. (2020). Exploring secondary school students’ attitudes about environmental education in relation to their perceptions about environmental problems: The case of viotia prefecture. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Scientific Education, 16(1), e02208. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6442

How to cite this article

APA

Sedano Aguilar, W. (2022). Interpretation of Reality in Sustainability Processes: Dialogues in the Framework of Global Warming. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(3), e2293. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12184

Vancouver

Sedano Aguilar W. Interpretation of Reality in Sustainability Processes: Dialogues in the Framework of Global Warming. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(3):e2293. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12184

AMA

Sedano Aguilar W. Interpretation of Reality in Sustainability Processes: Dialogues in the Framework of Global Warming. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(3), e2293. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12184

Chicago

Sedano Aguilar, Wesles. "Interpretation of Reality in Sustainability Processes: Dialogues in the Framework of Global Warming". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2022 18 no. 3 (2022): e2293. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12184

Harvard

Sedano Aguilar, W. (2022). Interpretation of Reality in Sustainability Processes: Dialogues in the Framework of Global Warming. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(3), e2293. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12184

MLA

Sedano Aguilar, Wesles "Interpretation of Reality in Sustainability Processes: Dialogues in the Framework of Global Warming". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 18, no. 3, 2022, e2293. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12184