Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education

• Abou-Assali, M. (2014). The link between teacher professional development and student achievement: A critical view. International Journal of Bilingual & Multilingual Teachers of English, 2(01), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijbmte/​020104
• Aiken, L. (1997) Questionnaires and inventories: Surveying opinions and assessing personality. John Wiley.
• Al-Balushi, S. M., Ambusaidi, A. K., Al-Balushi, K. A., Al-Hajri, F. H., & Al-Sinani, M. S. (2020a). Student-centred and teacher-centred science classrooms as visualized by science teachers and their supervisors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 103014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103014
• Al-Balushi, S. M., Emam, M. M., & Al-Abri, K. M. (2020b). Leadership and teacher education in Oman. In R. Papa (Ed.), Oxford Encyclopedia of Educational Administration (pp. 1-24). Oxford University Press.
• Al Barwani, T., & Bailey, J. (2016). Local challenges, global solutions: Oman’s experience with accreditation: The case of Sultan Qaboos University. In N. Michelli, R. Dada, D. Eldridge, R. Tamim, & K. Karp (Eds.), Teacher quality and teacher education quality (pp. 151-166). Routledge.
• Al-Qamish, M., & Kharbasha, O. (2009). Evaluation of practicum training program for special education students in the Jordanian community colleges from their perspectives and their cooperative teachers. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 10(1), 39-66. https://doi.org/10.12785/JEPS/100102
• Ambusaidi, A., & Al-Balushi, S. (2015). Science education in the Sultanate of Oman: Status and reform. In N. Mansour & S. Al-Shamrani (Eds.), Cultural perspectives in science education. Science education in the Arab Gulf States: Visions, sociocultural contexts and challenges (pp. 189-204). Sense Publishers.
• Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318​9X11428813
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
• Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development: Six theories of child development. JAI Press.
• Bandura, A. (1997a). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press.
• Bandura, A. (1997b). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
• Banko, W. (2013). Science for the next generation: Preparing for the new standards. NSTA Press.
• Basith, A., Syahputra, A., & Aris Ichwanto, M. (2020). Academic self-efficacy as predictor of academic achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia [Indonesian Journal of Education], 9(1), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.24403
• Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self- efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485-499. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131
• Bursal, M. (2010). Turkish preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs regarding mathematics and science teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(4), 649-666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9179-6
• Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001
• Chen, Y.‑L., Huang, L.‑F., & Wu, P.‑C. (2021). Preservice preschool teachers’ self-efficacy in and need for STEM education professional development: STEM pedagogical belief as a mediator. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(2), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01055-3
• Christian, B. J. (2017). Primary pre-service teachers’ perceptions of course related factors that enhance instructional self-efficacy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.14221/​ajte.2017v42n2.2
• College of Education, Sultan Qaboos University. (2021). The internal quality of instruction.
• Cronin-Jones, L. L. (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280305
• Dumas, D., Schmidt, L. C., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Predicting creative problem solving in engineering design. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.002
• English, L. D. (2017). Advancing elementary and middle school STEM education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x
• English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7
• Felix, A., & Harris, J. (2010). A project-based, STEM-integrated alternative energy team challenge for teachers. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 69(5), 29.
• FIEI. (2012). Teacher efficacy and beliefs toward STEM survey. Friday Institute for Educational Innovation.
• Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE.
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
• Geng, J., Jong, M. S.‑Y., & Chai, C. S. (2019). Hong Kong teachers’ self-efficacy and concerns about STEM Education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0414-1
• Gero, A., & Danino, O. (2016). High-school course on engineering design: Enhancement of students’ motivation and development of systems thinking skills. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1A), 100-110.
• Griethuijsen, R. A. L. F., Eijck, M. W., Haste, H., Brok, P. J., Skinner, N. C., Mansour, N., Gencer, A. S., & BouJaoude, S. (2014). Global patterns in students’ views of science and interest in science. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 581-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9438-6
• Gurcay, D. (2015). Preservice physics teachers’ beliefs regarding their teacher efficacy and classroom management. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1101-1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.353
• Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM integration in middle school life science: Student learning and attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 550-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/​s10956-016-9612-x
• Haatainen, O., Turkka, J., & Aksela, M. (2021). Science teachers’ perceptions and self-efficacy beliefs related to integrated science education. Education Sciences, 11(6), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060272
• Hammack, R., & Ivey, T. (2017). Examining elementary teachers’ engineering self-efficacy and engineering teacher efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1-2), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12205
• Hoeg, D. G., & Bencze, J. L. (2017). Values underpinning STEM education in the USA: An analysis of the next generation science standards. Science Education, 101(2), 278-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21260
• Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013). How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 774-786. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032198
• Hoy, A. W., Hoy, W. K., & Davis, H. A. (2009). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. In K. R. Wentzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 627-653). Routledge.
• Hudson, P., English, L., Dawes, L., King, D., & Baker, S. (2015). Exploring links between pedagogical knowledge practices and student outcomes in STEM education for primary schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(6), 134-151. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n6.8
• Jason, L., & Glenwick, D. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/​9780190243654.001.0001
• Kang, E. J. S., Donovan, C., & McCarthy, M. J. (2018). Exploring elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and confidence in implementing the NGSS science and engineering practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(1), 9-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.​1415616
• Kitsantas, A., & Baylor, A. (2001). The impact of the instructional planning self-reflective tool on preservice teacher performance, disposition, and self-efficacy beliefs regarding systematic instructional planning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504949
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/​10402454.2005.10784518
• Li, Y., Huang, Z., Jiang, M., & Chang, T.-W. (2016). The effect on pupils’ science performance and problem-solving ability through Lego: An engineering design-based modeling approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 143-156.
• Malkawi, A. R., & Rababah, E. Q. (2018). Jordanian twelfth-grade science teachers’ self-reported usage of science and engineering practices in the next generation science standards. International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 961-976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1460695
• Marulcu, I., & Barnett, M. (2013). Fifth graders’ learning about simple machines through engineering design-based instruction using LEGO™ materials. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1825-1850. https://doi.org/10.1007/​s11165-012-9335-9
• MoE. (2020). Vision and mission. Ministry of Education-Oman. http://havasapps.com/test/moe/?page_id=2498
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/​international-results/
• NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Research Council.
• NSTA. (2020). 2020 NSTA/ASTE standards for science teacher preparation. National Science Teachers Association. http://static.nsta.org/pdfs/2020NSTAStandards.pdf
• Oman Educational Portal. (2019). STEM Oman programme. Ministry of Education. https://home.moe.gov.om/updates/​3/show/1057
• Oman-2040. (2020). Oman vision 2040. https://www.2040.om/​en/oman-vision-2040/about-the-vision/
• Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design-based modeling approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3-4), 429-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672060
• Public and Private Universities in Oman. (2021). National reference document for teacher preparation programmes in Oman: A project to improve and raise the efficiency of teacher preparation in public and private universities in Oman (preliminary draft). Ministry of Education.
• Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E. & Wieselmann, J.R. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00259-8
• Sezgin Selcuk, G., Sahin, M., & Acikgoz, K. U. (2011). The effects of learning strategy instruction on achievement, attitude, and achievement motivation in a physics course. Research in Science Education, 41(1), 39-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9145-x
• Shahat, M. A., Ohle, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). Evaluation of a teaching unit based on a problem-solving model for seventh-grade students. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 23(1), 205-224. https://doi.org/​10.1007/s40573-017-0068-1
• Shahat, M. A., Ohle-Peters, A., & Ambusaidi, A. (2022a). Teaching with texts and pictures in science classes: Teachers' attitudes and motivational orientations at different school levels. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.​1909231
• Shahat, M. A., Ambusaidi, A. Treagust, D. F (2022b). Omani teachers’ perceived self-efficacy beliefs for teaching science as inquiry: Influences of gender, teaching, experience and preparation programme [Submitted for publication].
• Smolleck, L. D., Zembal-Saul, C., & Yoder, E. P. (2006). The development and validation of an instrument to measure preservice teachers’ self-efficacy in regard to the teaching of science as inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(2), 137-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9015-6
• Srikoom, W., & Faikhamta, C. (2018). Assessing in-service teachers’ self-efficacy and beliefs about STEM education. Journal of Education, 12(4), 169-186.
• Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., Loof, H. de, Meester, J. de, Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., & Cock, M. de (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2-12. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
• Webb, D. (2015). Engineering professional development: Elementary teachers’ self-efficacy and sources of self-efficacy [Ed.D. dissertation, Portland State University]. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.2334
• Yenice, N. (2009). Search of science teachers’ teacher efficacy and self-efficacy levels relating to science teaching for some variables. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1062-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.​01.191
• Yesilyurt, E., Deniz, H. & Kaya, E. (2021). Exploring sources of engineering teaching self-efficacy for pre-service elementary teachers. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00299-8
• Zaher, A. A., & Damaj, I. W. (2018). Extending STEM education to engineering programs at the undergraduate college level. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 8(3), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v8i3.8402

APA

Shahat, M. A., Al-Balushi, S. M., & Al-Amri, M. (2022). Investigating Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Teaching Science Through Engineering Design Processes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2291. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12121

Vancouver

Shahat MA, Al-Balushi SM, Al-Amri M. Investigating Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Teaching Science Through Engineering Design Processes. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4):e2291. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12121

AMA

Shahat MA, Al-Balushi SM, Al-Amri M. Investigating Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Teaching Science Through Engineering Design Processes. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4), e2291. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12121

Chicago

Shahat, Mohamed A., Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi, and Mohammed Al-Amri. "Investigating Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Teaching Science Through Engineering Design Processes". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2022 18 no. 4 (2022): e2291. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12121

Harvard

Shahat, M. A., Al-Balushi, S. M., and Al-Amri, M. (2022). Investigating Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Teaching Science Through Engineering Design Processes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2291. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12121

MLA

Shahat, Mohamed A. et al. "Investigating Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Teaching Science Through Engineering Design Processes". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 18, no. 4, 2022, e2291. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12121