Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education

• Armstrong, A.K., & Krasny, M.E. (2020). Tracing paths from research to practice in climate change education. Sustainability, 12(11), 4779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114779.
• Bamberg, S. & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002.
• Brody, S., Grover, H., & Vedlitz, A. (2012). Examining the willingness of Americans to alter behaviour to mitigate climate change. Climate Policy, 12(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.579261.
• Brügger, A., Dessai, S., Devine-Wright, P., Morton, T.A., & Pidgeo, N.F. (2015). Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5, 1031-1037. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2760.
• Chu, H. & Yang, J. Z. (2018). Taking climate change here and now – mitigating ideological polarization with psychological distance. Global Environmental Change, 53(1), 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.013.
• Connecting on Climate: A Guide to Effective Climate Communication. (2014). EcoAmerica & Center for Research on Environmental Decisions, Columbia University.
• Dickinson, J. L., McLeod, P., Bloomfield, R., & Allred, S. (2016). Which moral foundations predict willingness to make lifestyle changes to avert climate change in the USA? PLOS ONE 11(10), e0163852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163852.
• Drummond, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2017). Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. PNAS, 114(36), 9587-9592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704882114.
• Eyal, T., Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., Liberman, N. (2009). When values matter: Expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.023.
• Khadka, A., Jie Li, C., Stanis, S. W., & Morgan, M. (2021) Unpacking the power of place-based education in climate change communication. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 20(1), 77-91, https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2020.1719238.
• Krebs, R. R., & Rapport, A. (2012). International relations and the psychology of time horizons. International Studies Quarterly, 56(3), 530-543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00726.x.
• Ledgerwood, A., Trope, Y., & Chaiken, S. (2010). Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 99, 32–51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0019843.
• Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S., Kotcher, J., Bergquist, P., Ballew, M., Goldberg,
• M., & Gustafson, A. (2019). Climate Change in the American mind: April 2019. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
• Lorenzoni I., Nicholson-Cole S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change 17(3–4), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004.
• Lujala, P., Lein, H., & Rød, J. K. (2015) Climate change, natural hazards, and risk perception: The role of proximity and personal experience. Local Environment, 20(4), 489-509, https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.887666.
• Ockwell D., Whitmarsh L., & O’Neill, S. (2009) Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation: Forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement? Science Communication 30, 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1075547008328969.
• Pew Research Center. (2014). Political polarization in the American public: How increasing ideological uniformity and partisan antipathy affect politics, compromise and everyday life. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/.
• Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E.W., Leiserowitz, A., & Zhao, X. (2014). The genesis of climate change activism: From key beliefs to political action. Climatic Change 125, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1173-5.
• Scannell, L. & Gifford, R. (2011). Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013916511421196.
• Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20, 656-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002.
• Talisse, R. B. (2019). Overdoing democracy: Why we must put politics in its place. Oxford University Press. The Psychology of Climate Change Communication: A Guide for Scientists, Journalists, Educators, Political Aides, and the Interested Public. (2009). Center for Research on Environmental Decisions.
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018963.
• Van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci,10, 758–763. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1745691615598516.

APA

Shackley, M. J. (2021). Localizing Discussions of Climate Change Effects May Not Increase Students' Willingness to Engage in Pro-Environmental Behavior. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2257. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11149

Vancouver

Shackley MJ. Localizing Discussions of Climate Change Effects May Not Increase Students' Willingness to Engage in Pro-Environmental Behavior. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2021;17(4):e2257. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11149

AMA

Shackley MJ. Localizing Discussions of Climate Change Effects May Not Increase Students' Willingness to Engage in Pro-Environmental Behavior. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2021;17(4), e2257. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11149

Chicago

Shackley, Matthew James. "Localizing Discussions of Climate Change Effects May Not Increase Students' Willingness to Engage in Pro-Environmental Behavior". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2021 17 no. 4 (2021): e2257. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11149

Harvard

Shackley, M. J. (2021). Localizing Discussions of Climate Change Effects May Not Increase Students' Willingness to Engage in Pro-Environmental Behavior. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2257. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11149

MLA

Shackley, Matthew James "Localizing Discussions of Climate Change Effects May Not Increase Students' Willingness to Engage in Pro-Environmental Behavior". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 17, no. 4, 2021, e2257. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11149