Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education

• Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2006). Predators of knowledge construction: Interpreting students’ metacognition in an amusement park physics program. Science Education, 91(2), 298-320. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20176
• Anderson, D., Fisher, K., & Norman, G. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952-978. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10053
• Astolfi, J. P. (1994). El trabajo didáctico de los obstáculos, en el corazón de los aprendizajes científicos [The educational work of obstacles, at the heart of scientific learning]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias [Science Education], 12(2), 206-216. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.4442
• Astolfi, J. P. (1999). El tratamiento didáctico de los obstáculos epistemológicos [The didactic treatment of epistemological obstacles]. Revista Educación y Pedagogía [Education and Pedagogy Magazine], 11(25), 151-171.
• Astolfi, J. P. (2002). L’École pour apprendre [The school learns]. ESF.
• Astolfi, J., & Peterfalvi, B. (1997). Stratégies de travail des obstacles: dispositifs et resorts [Strategies to work on obstacles: devices and resorts]. Aster Recherchers en Didactique des Sciences Expérimentales [Aster Research in Didactics of Experimental Sciences], 25, 193-216. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/8685
• Atran, S., Medin, D., & Ross, N. (2006). Thinking about biology: Modular constraints on categorization and reasoning in the everyday life of Americans, Maya, and scientists. In R. Viale, D. Andler, & L. Hirschfeld (Eds.), Biological and cultural bases of human inference (pp. 97-130). Psychology Press.
• Atran, S., Medin, D., Lynch, E., Vapnarsky, V., Ucan Ek, E., & Sousa, P. (2001). Folkbiology doesn’t come from folkpsychology: Evidence from Yukatek Maya in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1(1), 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853701300063561
• Avargil, S., Lavi, R., & Dori, Y. (2018). Students’ metacognition and metacognitive strategies in science education. In Y. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 33-64). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_3
• Borges, J. L. (1944). Ficciones [Fictions]. Emecé.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE.
• Cho, M., Lankford, D., & Wescott, D. (2011). Exploring the relationships among epistemological beliefs, nature of science, and conceptual change in the learning of evolutionary theory. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-011-0324-7
• Clement, J., & Rea-Ramirez, M. (2008). Model based learning and instruction in science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6494-4
• Coley, J., & Tanner, K. (2012). Common origins of diverse misconceptions: Cognitive principles and the development of biology thinking. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11, 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-06-0074
• Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
• Dar-Nimrod, I., & Heine, S. (2011). Genetic essentialism: on the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin, 137(5), 800-818.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021860
• Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.82303
• Dawkins, R. (2017). Science in the soul: Selected writings of a passionate rationalist. Bantam Press.
• Del Río, M., & Strasser, K. (2007). ¿Tienen los niños una teoría esencialista acerca de la pobreza? [Do children have an essentialist theory about poverty?] Psykhe, 16(2), 139-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22282007000200012
• Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin´s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. Simon and Schuster.
• Donovan, B., & Nehm, R. (2020). Genetics and identity. Science & Education, 29, 1451-1458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00180-0
• Donovan, B., Stuhlsatz, M., Edelson, D., & Buck Bracey, Z. (2019). Gendered genetics: How reading about the genetic basis of sex differences in biology textbooks could affect beliefs associated with science gender disparities. Science Education, 103(4), 719-749. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21502
• Emmons, N., & Kelemen, D. (2015). Young children’s acceptance of within-species variation: Implications for essentialism and teaching evolution. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 148-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.011
• Evans, E. (2008). Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: A developmental analysis. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 263-294). Routledge.
• Flick, U. (2018). Designing qualitative research. SAGE.
• Futuyma, D. (2009). Evolution. Sinauer. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374144-8.00060-6
• Gaskins, I. & Elliot, T. (1991). Implementing cognitive strategy instruction across the school: The benchmark manual for teachers. Brookline Books.
• Gelman, S., & Legare, C. (2011). Concepts and folk theories. Annual review of anthropology, 40, 379-398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145822
• Gelman, S., & Rhodes, M. (2012). Two-thousand years of stasis. How psychological essentialism impedes evolutionary understanding. In K. Rosengren, S. Brem, E. Evans, & G. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges. Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 3-21). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730421.003.0001
• Gelman, S., Coley, J., & Gottfried, G. (1994). Essentialist beliefs in children: The acquisition of concepts and theories. In L. Hirschfeld, & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 128-160). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752902.014
• Giere, R. (1999). Using models to represent reality. In L. Magnani, N. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 41-57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_3
• Giere, R. (2004). How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 742-752. https://doi.org/10.1086/425063
• González Galli, L. (2011). Obstáculos para el aprendizaje del modelo de evolución por selección natural [Obstacles to learning the model of evolution by natural selection] [PhD thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires].
• González Galli, L., & Meinardi, E. (2017). Obstáculos para el aprendizaje del modelo de evolución por elección natural en estudiantes universitarios de biología [Obstacles to learning the model of evolution by natural choice in university biology students]. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias [Eureka Magazine on Teaching and Popularization of Sciences], 14(3), 535-549. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2017.v14.i3.03
• González Galli, L., Pérez, G., & Gómez Galindo, A. (2020). The self-regulation of teleological thinking in natural selection learning. Evo Edu Outreach, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-020-00120-0
• González Galli, L., Pérez, G., Alegre, C., & Joelson, S. (2018). Explicaciones, concepciones y obstáculos sobre el origen de las especies en estudiantes de escuela secundaria de Argentina [Explanations, conceptions and obstacles about the origin of species in high school students from Argentina]. Ciência & Educação [Science and Education], 24(3), 741-758. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320180030013
• Gregory, T. (2009). Understanding natural selection: essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(2), 156-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0128-1
• Harms, U., & Reiss, M. (2019). Evolution education re-considered. Understanding what works. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6
• Hirschfeld, L. (1994). Is the acquisition of social categories based on domain-specific competence or on knowledge transfer? In L. Hirschfeld, & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 285-328). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752902.009
• Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.002
• Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2006). Young children’s conception of the biological world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(4), 177-181. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8721.2006.00431.x
• Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P., & Kanselaar, G. (2012). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9061-5
• Jorba, J., & Sanmartí, N. (1996). Enseñar, aprender y evaluar: Un proceso de evaluación continua. Propuesta didáctica para las áreas de ciencias de la naturaleza y las matemáticas [Teaching, learning and evaluating: a process of continuous evaluation. Didactic proposal for the areas of natural sciences and mathematics]. Ministerio de Educación y Cultura.
• Kampourakis, K. (2014). Understanding evolution. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139542357
• Levins, R., & Lewontin, R. (1985). The dialectical biologist. Harvard University Press.
• Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Panadero, E. (2015). Promoting socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Progress of socially shared regulation among high-and low-performing groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 562-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.082
• Mayr, E. (1997). This is biology. The science of the living world. Harvard University Press.
• Mayr, E. (2004). What makes biology unique? Considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617188
• Nehm, R., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57(3), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570311
• Neuendorf, K. (2019). Content analysis and thematic analysis. In P. Brough (Ed.), Research methods for applied psychologists: Design, analysis and reporting (pp. 211-223). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315517971-21
• Passmore, C., Svoboda, J., & Giere, R. (2014). Models in science and in learning science: Focusing scientific practice on sense-making. In R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1171-1202). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_36
• Perez, G. (2021). La regulación metacognitiva de los obstáculos epistemológicos en la construcción de modelos de biología evolutiva en la escuela media [The metacognitive regulation of epistemological obstacles in the construction of evolutionary biology models in middle school] [PhD thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires].
• Pérez, G., Gómez Galindo, A. A., & González Galli, L. (2018). Enseñanza de la evolución: Fundamentos para el diseño de una propuesta didáctica basada en la modelización y la metacognición sobre los obstáculos epistemológicos [Teaching of evolution: Foundations for the design of a didactic proposal based on modeling and metacognition about epistemological obstacles]. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias [Eureka Magazine on Teaching and Popularization of Sciences], 15(2), 2102. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2018.v15.i2.2102
• Pérez, G., Gómez Galindo, A., & González Galli, L. (2021). La regulación de los obstáculos epistemológicos en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la evolución [The regulation of epistemological obstacles in the teaching and learning of evolution]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias [Science Education], 39(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2968
• Peterfalvi, B. (1997). Enseignants et élèves face aux obstacles [Teachers and students facing obstacles]. Aster Recherchers en Didactique des Sciences Expérimentales [Aster Research in Didactics of Experimental Sciences], 25, 193-216. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042%2F8677
• Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. Viking Books.
• Pintrich, P., Wolters, C., & Baxter, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw, & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43-97). Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
• Pozo, J. (2016) Aprender en tiempos revueltos. La nueva ciencia del aprendizaje [Learn in troubled times. The new science of learning]. Alianza.
• Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. Jossey-Bass Ltd.
• Ronfard, S., Brown, S., Doncaster, E., & Kelemen, D. (2021). Inhibiting intuition: Scaffolding children’s theory construction about species evolution in the face of competing explanations. Cognition, 211, 104635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104635
• Rosengren, K., Brem, S., Evans, E., & Sinatra, G. (2012). Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730421.001.0001
• Saab, N. (2012). Team regulation, regulation of social activities or co-regulation: Different labels for effective regulation of learning in CSCL. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9085-5
• Saldaña, D., & Aguilera, A. (2003). La evaluación de los procesos metacognitivos: Estrategias y problemática actuales [The evaluation of metacognitive processes: Current strategies and problems]. Estudios de Psicología [Psychology Studies], 24(2), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093903765762901
• Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions. Cambridge University Press.
• Samarapungavan, A., & Wiers, R. W. (1997). Children’s thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 147-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80021-4
• Sawyer, K. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833
• Schraw, G., & Gutierrez, A. (2015). Metacognitive strategy instruction that highlights the role of monitoring and control processes. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Metacognition: Fundaments, applications, and trends. A profile of the current state-of-the-art (pp. 3-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2_1
• Shtulman, A., & Schulz, L. (2008). The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science, 32(6), 1049-1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210801897864

APA

Perez, G., Gómez Galindo, A. A., & González Galli, L. (2022). Metacognitive Regulation of Essentialism in the Teaching of Evolution. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2295. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12223

Vancouver

Perez G, Gómez Galindo AA, González Galli L. Metacognitive Regulation of Essentialism in the Teaching of Evolution. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4):e2295. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12223

AMA

Perez G, Gómez Galindo AA, González Galli L. Metacognitive Regulation of Essentialism in the Teaching of Evolution. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(4), e2295. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12223

Chicago

Perez, Gaston, Alma Adrianna Gómez Galindo, and Leonardo González Galli. "Metacognitive Regulation of Essentialism in the Teaching of Evolution". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2022 18 no. 4 (2022): e2295. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12223

Harvard

Perez, G., Gómez Galindo, A. A., and González Galli, L. (2022). Metacognitive Regulation of Essentialism in the Teaching of Evolution. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2295. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12223

MLA

Perez, Gaston et al. "Metacognitive Regulation of Essentialism in the Teaching of Evolution". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 18, no. 4, 2022, e2295. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12223