What Scientists Do: Engaging in Science Practices through a Wonder-Framed Nature Study

Steph Dean; Andrew Gilbert

doi:10.21601/ijese/11136

Full Text (PDF)

Steph Dean ¹ ^* , Andrew Gilbert ¹

More Detail

¹ College of Education and Human Development, George Mason University, UNITED STATES^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Despite recent reforms concerning how students engage in science, there have been significant challenges for educators seeking to consistently implement science practices within the classroom. This study considered science practices within a wonder-framed nature study as one possible way for educators to support students as they take on the role of scientists. We interviewed twenty students in Grades 3 through 5 who had participated in wonder journaling sessions outdoors that led to an investigative project and presentation. The evidence suggests that students strongly engaged in investigative science practices, and that they also experienced opportunities for sensemaking and critiquing practices. Through a qualitative data analysis, four main themes emerged that provide insight into the experiences of the students within the study: joy, community, autonomy, and challenges. The data indicate that wonder is an authentic and viable route towards the implementation of the science practices within an elementary school setting. The implications of this study are considerable and offer strategies for educators seeking to incorporate science practices in an authentic way that integrates both wonder and outdoor learning.

Keywords

science practices
NGSS
wonder
outdoor learning
nature journaling

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED, Volume 17, Issue 4, 2021, Article No: e2255

https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11136

Publication date: 11 Aug 2021

Article Views: 2131

Article Downloads: 1515

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Antink-Meyer, A., & Meyer, D. (2016). Science teachers’ misconceptions in science and engineering distinctions: Reflections on modern research examples. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27, 625–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9478-z
Alley, K. M. (2019). Fostering middle school students’ autonomy to support motivation and engagement. Middle School Journal, 50(3), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2019.1603801
Arias, A. M., & Davis, E. A. (2016). Making and recording observations: When done well, observations can serve as evidence when engaging in science practices. Science and Children, 58(8), 54-60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i24721642
Baker, J., & Goodboy, A. (2018). The choice is yours: The effects of autonomy-supportive instruction on students’ learning and communication. Communication Education, 68, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1536793
Benedict-Chambers, A., & Fortner, T. (2019). The right kind of questions. Science and Children, 56(9), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc19_056_09_50
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bybee, R. W. (2014). NGSS and the next generation of science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 211–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9381-4
Cherbow, K., McKinley, M. T., McNeill, K. L., & Lowenhaupt, R. (2020). An analysis of science instruction for the science practices: Examining coherence across system levels and components in current systems of science education in K-8 schools. Science Education, 104(3), 446–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21573
Duschl, R. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Planning and carrying out investigations: An entry to learning and to teacher professional development around NGSS science and engineering practices. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-014-0012-6
Engle, R.A., & Conant, F.R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399 - 483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
Feynman, R. (1999). The value of science. In J. Robbins (Ed.), The pleasure of finding things out: The best short works of Richard Feynman (pp. 141-151). Perseus/Helix Books.
Forbes, A., & Skamp, K. (2014). “Because we weren’t actually teaching them, we thought they weren’t learning”: Primary teacher perspectives from the My Science initiative. Research in Science Education, 44(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013- 9367-9
Gilbert, A. (2020). Pathways to wonder-infused practice: Investigating the transition from pre-service to in-service teacher. In A. Schinkel (Ed.) Wonder, education, and human flourishing (pp. 212-236). Amsterdam: Vrije University Press.
Gilbert, A. & Byers, C. (2017). Wonder as a tool to engage preservice elementary teachers in science learning and teaching. Science Education. 101(6), 907-928. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21300
Gilbert, A., & Byers, C.C. (2020). Enacting wonder-infused pedagogy in an elementary science methods course. Innovations in Science Teacher Education, 5(1). https://innovations.theaste.org/enacting-wonder-infused-pedagogy-in-an-elementary-science-methods-course/
Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). Wonder: The extraordinary power of an ordinary experience. Bloomsbury Academic.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2012). Fostering a sense of wonder in the science classroom. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 985–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9225-6
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2014). Reclaiming the value of wonder in science education. In K. Egan, A. Cant, & G. Judson (Eds.), Wonder-Full education: The centrality of wonder in teaching, and learning across the curriculum (pp. 40-65). Routledge.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2016). Imaginative science education: The central role of imagination in science education. Springer International.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2020). Wonder: Its nature and its role in the learning process. In A. Schinkel (Ed.) Wonder, education, and human flourishing (pp. 185-212). Amsterdam: Vrije University Press.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, & mixed approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Kang, E. J. S., Donovan, C., & McCarthy, M. J. (2018). Exploring elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and confidence in implementing the NGSS science and engineering practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29, 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1415616
Kawasaki, J., & Sandoval, W. A. (2019). The role of teacher framing in producing coherent NGSS-aligned teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(8), 906–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1657765
Kawasaki, J., & Sandoval, W. A. (2020). Examining teachers’ classroom strategies to understand their goals for student learning around the science practices in the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(4), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1709726
Kelley, T. R., Geoffery, K. J., Holland, J. D., & Han, J. (2020). Increasing high school teachers self-efficacy for integrated STEM instruction through a collaborative community of practice. International Journal of STEM Education 7, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00211-w
Lowell, B. R., Cherbow, K., & McNeill, K. L. (2021). Redesign or relabel? How a commercial curriculum and its implementation oversimplify key features of the NGSS. Science Education, 105(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21604
McNeill, K. L., Katsh-Singer, R., & Pelletier, P. (2015). Assessing science practices: Moving your class along a continuum. Science Scope, 39(4), 21–28. http://digital.nsta.org/publication/?i=279817&article_id=2318459&view=articleBrowser
McNeill, K. L., Lowenhaupt, R. J., & Katsh‐Singer, R. (2018). Instructional leadership in the era of the NGSS: Principals’ understandings of science practices. Science Education, 102(3), 452–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21336
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Merritt, E. G., Chiu, J., Peters-Burton, E., & Bell, R. (2018). Teachers’ integration of scientific and engineering practices in primary classrooms. Research in Science Education, 48, 1321–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9604-0
Milne, I. (2010). A sense of wonder, arising from aesthetic experiences, should be the starting point for inquiry in primary science. Science Education International, 21(2), 102-115. http://www.icaseonline.net/sei/june2010/p4_ian.pdf
National Science Teaching Association. (2014). Science and Engineering Practices. https://ngss.nsta.org/PracticesFull.aspx#:~:text=The%20practices%20describe%20behaviors%20that,and%20build%20models%20and%20systems.
Next Generation Science Standards. (April, 2013). Appendix F – Science and Engineering Practices in the NGSS. https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/Appendix%20F%20%20Science%20and%20Engineering%20Practices%20in%20the%20NGSS%20-%20FINAL%20060513.pdf
Nyman, M., & St. Clair, T. (2016). A geometric model to teach nature of science, science practices, and metacognition. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(5). https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst16_045_05_44
Pasley, J. D., Trygstad, P. J., & Banilower, E. R. (2016, April). Towards Engagement with the Science and Engineering Practices for All Students. [Paper Presentation] 2016 NARST Annual International Conference. Baltimore, MD. http://www.horizon-research.com/horizonresearchwp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/SCIOPS-2016-NARST-Paper.pdf
Reeve, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Assor, A., Ahmad, I., Cheon, S., Jang, H., Kaplan, H., Moss, J., Olaussen, B., & Wang, C. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motivation & Emotion, 38(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9367-0
Trotman, D. (2014). Wow! What if? So what?: Education and the imagination of wonder:
Fascination, possibilities and opportunities missed. In K. Egan, A. Cant, & G. Judson (Eds.). Wonder-Full education: The centrality of wonder in teaching, and learning across the curriculum (pp. 22-39). Routledge.
Washington, H. (2019). A Sense of Wonder towards Nature: Healing the Planet through Belonging. New York: Routledge.
Wilson, E.O. (2013). Letters to a young scientist. Liveright.

How to cite this article

APA

Dean, S., & Gilbert, A. (2021). What Scientists Do: Engaging in Science Practices through a Wonder-Framed Nature Study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2255. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11136

Vancouver

Dean S, Gilbert A. What Scientists Do: Engaging in Science Practices through a Wonder-Framed Nature Study. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2021;17(4):e2255. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11136

AMA

Dean S, Gilbert A. What Scientists Do: Engaging in Science Practices through a Wonder-Framed Nature Study. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2021;17(4), e2255. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11136

Chicago

Dean, Steph, and Andrew Gilbert. "What Scientists Do: Engaging in Science Practices through a Wonder-Framed Nature Study". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2021 17 no. 4 (2021): e2255. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11136

Harvard

Dean, S., and Gilbert, A. (2021). What Scientists Do: Engaging in Science Practices through a Wonder-Framed Nature Study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2255. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11136

MLA

Dean, Steph et al. "What Scientists Do: Engaging in Science Practices through a Wonder-Framed Nature Study". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 17, no. 4, 2021, e2255. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11136