Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education

• Aristotle (2002). Metaphysics. (Translated by Sachs, Joe (2nd ed.). Santa Fe, N.M.: Green Lion Press.
• Ball, P. (2013). Curiosity: How science became interested in everything. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Bazhydai, M., & Westermann, G. (2020). From curiosity, to wonder, to creativity: A cognitive developmental psychology perspective. In A. Schinkel (Ed.), Wonder, education, and human flourishing: Theoretical, empirical and practical perspectives (pp. 144- 182). Amsterdam: VU University Press.
• Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Burnyeat, M.F. (1990). The Theaetetus of Plato (Translated by Jane Levett). Hackett.
• Cacciamani, S. (2010). Towards a knowledge building community: From guided to self-organized inquiry. Canadian Journal of Teaching and Learning, 36, 1-16.
• Carson, R. (1965). The sense of wonder. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
• Cobern, W. (1996). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Science Education, 80, 579-610.
• Dahlin, B. (2001). The primacy of cognition- or of perception? A phenomenological critique of the theoretical bases of science education. Science & Education, 10, 453-475.
• Dawkins, R (1998). Unweaving the rainbow: Science, delusion, and the appetite for wonder. New York: Teachers College Press.
• De Cruz, H. (2020). Awe and wonder in scientific practice: Implications for the relationship between science and religion. In M. Fuller, D. Evers, A, Runehov, K-W.,Sæther, & B., Michollet Eds.), Issues in Science and Theology: Nature – and Beyond (pp. 155-168). Springer.
• Dewey, J. (1998). How we think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. (First pubished 1910, D.C. Heath)
• Drew, C., Hadrman, M., & Hosp, J. (2008). Designing and conduting reserach in education. Los Angeles, London: SAGE Publications.
• Egan, K. (2005). Students’ development in theory and practice: The doubtful role of research. Harvard Educational Review, 75, 25-42.
• Eiseley, L. (1978). The star thrower. New York: Times Books.
• Feynman, R. (1969). What is science? The Physics Teacher 7, 313-320.
• Feynman, R. (1989). What do you care what other people think? London, UK: Unwin/Hyman.
• Feynman, R. (2015). The quotable Feynman. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Gilbert, A. (2020). Pathways to wonder-infused practice: Investigating the transition from pre-service to in-service teacher. In A. Schinkel (Ed.), Wonder, education, and human flourishing: Theoretical, empirical and practical perspectives (212-236). Amsterdam: VU University Press.
• Gilbert, A., & Byers, C. (2017). Wonder as a tool to engage preservice elementary teachers in science learning and teaching. Science Education, 101, 907-928.
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London, New York: Routledge.
• Glăveanu, V. (2019). Creativity and wonder. The Journal of Creative Behaviour, 53, Issue 2, 171-177.
• Glăveanu, V. (2020). Wonder. The extraordinary power of an ordinary experience. Bloomsbury Academic.
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2007). Wonder: Why is it important and how can it be evoked in the science classroom? Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Imagination and Education. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada, July 14-17, 2007.
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2012). Fostering a sense of wonder in the science classroom. Research in Science Education, 42, 985-1005.
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2014). Reclaiming the value of wonder in science education. In K. Egan, A. Cant, & G. Judson (Eds.), Wonder-full education: The centrality of wonder in teaching and learning across the curriculum (pp. 40-66). New York: Routledge.
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2016). Imaginative science education. The central role of imagination in science education. Cham: Springer International.
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2020). Wonder” Its nature and its role in the learning process. In Schinkel, A. (Ed.) (2020). Wonder, education, and human flourishing: Theoretical, empirical and practical perspectives. Amsterdam: VU University Press. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/41804/Schinkel%20OA%20inc%20cover.pdf?sequence=1
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y. & Garganourakis, V. (2010). Using Nikola Tesla’s life and experiments as presented in the film ‘The Prestige’ to promote scientific inquiry: A report of an action research project. Interchange, 41,363-378.
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Prevezanou, B., Kabouropoulou, M., & Konsolas, M. (2011). Teaching about the importance of trees. A study with young children. Environmental Education Research, 17, 519-536.
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Skoumios, M. (2013). The development of environmental awareness through school science: Problems and possibilities. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8, 405-426.
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y. & Schulz, R. (2014). Romanticism and romantic science: Their contribution to science education. Science & Education, 23, 1963-2006.
• Matthews, M. (2015). Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
• Heidegger, M. (2008). Being and time. (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson Trans.). New York: Harper Perennial. (Original work published 1927)
• Jardine, D., Clifford, P., & Friesen, S. (2003). Back to the basics of teaching and learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Hynes‐Berry, M., & Berry, G. (2014). “Reading an object”: Developing effective scientific inquiry using student questions. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 87-97.
• Kashdan, T. (2019). A new scientific framework for curiosity. Paper presented at the International Conference on Wonder, Education, and Human Flourishing, Amsterdam, Casa Hotel, April 5-6, 2019. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
• Krajcik, J., Mamlok, R., & Hug, B. (2001). Learning science through inquiry. In L. Corno (Ed.), Education across a century: The centennial volume (pp. 205–238). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
• Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50.
• Lindhom, M. (2018). Promoting curiosity? Pitfalls and possibilities. Science & Education, 27, 987–1002.
• Llewellyn, D. (2011). Differentiated science inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
• Lloyd, G. (2018). Reclaimimng wonder. After the sublime. Endiburg: Endiburg University Press.
• Marcel, G. (1963). Existential background of human dignity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: AAAS
• National Research Council (2007). Taking science to school. Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academic Press
• Opdal, P. M. (2001). Curiosity, wonder and education seen as perspective development. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20, 331-344.2, 435-445.
• Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
• Pugh, K. (2011). Transformative experience: An integrative construct in the spirit of Deweyan pragmatism. Educational Psychologist, 46, 107-121.
• Riga, F., Winterbottom, M., Harris, E., & Newby, L (2017). Inquiry-based science education. In K. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science education: An international course companion. Springer.
• Schank, R. (2004). Making minds less well educated than our own. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Schinkel, A. (2017). The educational importance of deep wonder. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51, 538-553.
• Schinkel, A. (Ed.) (2020). Wonder, education, and human flourishing: Theoretical, empirical and practical perspectives. Amsterdam: VU University Press.
• Silverman, M. (1989). Two sides of wonder: Philosophical keys to the motivation of science learning. Synthese, 80, 43-6.
• Stolberg, T. (2008). Whither the sense of wonder f pre-service primary teachers’ when teaching science? A preliminary study of personal experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1958-1964.
• Taylor, J. (1998). Poetic knowledge. The recovery of education. New York: SUNY Press.
• Tegmark, M. (2015). Our mathematical universe. UK: Penguin Books.
• Whitehead, A. N. (1938). Modes of thought. New York: McMillan.
• Wong, D. (2007). Beyond control and rationality: Dewey, aesthetics, motivation, and educative experiences. Teachers College Record, 109, 192-220.

APA

Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2022). Students’ Reactions to Natural and Physical Phenomena: Documenting Wonder and Engagement with Science Content Knowledge. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(1), e2261. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11340

Vancouver

Hadzigeorgiou Y. Students’ Reactions to Natural and Physical Phenomena: Documenting Wonder and Engagement with Science Content Knowledge. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(1):e2261. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11340

AMA

Hadzigeorgiou Y. Students’ Reactions to Natural and Physical Phenomena: Documenting Wonder and Engagement with Science Content Knowledge. INTERDISCIP J ENV SCI ED. 2022;18(1), e2261. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11340

Chicago

Hadzigeorgiou, Yannis. "Students’ Reactions to Natural and Physical Phenomena: Documenting Wonder and Engagement with Science Content Knowledge". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 2022 18 no. 1 (2022): e2261. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11340

Harvard

Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2022). Students’ Reactions to Natural and Physical Phenomena: Documenting Wonder and Engagement with Science Content Knowledge. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(1), e2261. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11340

MLA

Hadzigeorgiou, Yannis "Students’ Reactions to Natural and Physical Phenomena: Documenting Wonder and Engagement with Science Content Knowledge". Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol. 18, no. 1, 2022, e2261. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11340